Article

Provincial and Regional Differences in Self-reported Health and Health Service Use among Ontario Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Julie Duff Cloutiera, Phyllis Montgomeryb, Jorge Virchezc, Bruce E. Oddsond
Author Information & Copyright

Received: 2025-10-30 ; Accepted: 2025-12-10

Published Online: 2025-12-31

Abstract

The northern region of the province of Ontario varies greatly from the southern region. Access and availability of healthcare resources also varies. Those persons living within the northern regions with a chronic condition, such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) may face challenges managing their condition within the context of this region. The objectives of the study were: 1) to describe self-reported health and other health-related variables among those living with COPD in northern Ontario and 2) to determine the association between self-reported health and health services used by those living with COPD in northern Ontario. Methods: An analysis of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) 2017-2018 was undertaken to examine the impact of COPD on self-rated health and health service use. Chi square and logistic regression were used to investigate the relationships between self-reported health, health variables, and use of health services. Results: Those living with COPD in the northern regions of the province were more likely to report poor self-rated health, mental health, and less life satisfaction than those living with COPD elsewhere in the province. Differences were noted in the types of health care services accessed and differences noted in their report of unmet healthcare needs. Conclusion: There are notable health care disparities in this region compared to the rest of the province. These may be partially responsible for lower self-reported health of people with COPD living in northern Ontario.

Keywords: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), health service use, health care access, northern/rural/remote populations, self-reported health

본문

Introduction

Canadians in northern regions do not have the same access to health care as those living in southern regions. In principle, the same levels of funding and government support exist, but there are real differences in access, reflecting a variety of economic, structural and geographical challenges.

Canadian health care is the responsibility of the respective provinces – meaning that policies and per capita investment are equivalent across each province. Despite this, the health of persons living in the north is substantially worse than persons living elsewhere in the province. Persons in the northern areas of Ontario have a shorter life expectancy, are more likely to die prematurely from cardiovascular or respiratory diseases, and have overall higher rates of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases among men and women than those living elsewhere in Ontario (Health Quality Ontario, 2017; North East Local Health Integration Network, 2017).

There are a number of differences between Northern and Southern Ontario that are relevant to these outcomes. The geographical location and the type of community one resides within, has both direct and indirect impacts on healthcare access and health outcomes (McGibbon, 2016). Rural, remote, ‘fly-in’, northern, and urban locations all have a reduced spectrum of available health care services relative to urban areas. Northern, rural and remote communities also typically house a population with lower socioeconomic status – which in turn both directly and indirectly affects health care access. Directly, because education, wealth, and social resources help people access and make use of medical services. Indirectly, because if one choses to travel from their community to access health care there are expenses associated with transportation, accommodation, and, perhaps, the costs of health services and/or products themselves. Additionally, the flexibility of employment and ability to take time off work to access healthcare is another important factor, and is perhaps an even more significant factor in the northern regions as travel time, distance to services, and weather will affect health care access. All of these factors play a role in decision making as persons are determining when, how, and with whom, they interface with in order to receive healthcare.

Previous research has described health service use in Canada (Sibley & Weiner, 2011), the North (Young et al., 2015, 2016, 2019), in Ontario (Burnett et al., 2020), and specifically compared northern and southern areas of Ontario (Crighton et al., 2015; A. Gershon et al., 2013; A. S. Gershon et al., 2017) It is clear that the use of acute care services, rates of hospitalization, emergency department visits and ambulatory care visits are much higher in the northern, less populated areas than in the urban south (Crighton et al., 2015; A. Gershon et al., 2013) . However, the previous findings do not tell the whole story or fully explain differences noted regarding health service use in Ontario. A more nuanced view would include information regarding use of additional health services such as health services that are not publicly funded by the provincial government. It can also be important to distinguish between the access gaps for acute and chronic conditions.

Acute emergencies can be treated by transferring patients to the resources; and it is difficult to study differential outcomes as a function of health service because administrative databases rarely contain enough clinical detail to evaluate any impact of treatment delays. However, with chronic conditions, such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), we can investigate the long-term impact of access disparities.

COPD is often described as an ambulatory-care sensitive condition, meaning it is best managed in the primary care setting. Those living with COPD have multiple interface points with the healthcare system as they interact and seek healthcare services. In this study, COPD, is used to further explore self-reported health and self-reported health service use as it relates to geography. We aim to expand upon what is known regarding healthcare service availability and use, thus describing the interactions one reports with the healthcare system should occur with a population known to access the healthcare system in order to manage their chronic condition, such as persons living with COPD. Additionally, rates of COPD are higher in northern Ontario compared to other areas of the province (Crighton et al., 2015; Health Quality Ontario, 2017). The population of those living with this condition provides a suitable backdrop to better understand the accessibility and availability of different types of healthcare services. The exploration of the type and quantity of health services accessed and their impact on self-reported health, may help healthcare providers and policy makers better understand the healthcare needs of those living with COPD in this region.

This important healthcare issue warrants examination as one considers the broader implications of such a large population of affected persons. The number of persons living with COPD in Ontario and especially in northern Ontario is substantial and the evidence suggests there is a large gap in healthcare access and the overall health of these individuals. Further evidence to support policy change and care for this population has potential to affect a large proportion of Ontarians.

In this study, data were analysed from a nationally representative population-based, health survey, the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS). The Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) provides a unique perspective of the self-reported use of healthcare services. The CCHS also provides data on self-reported health service use beyond acute care services that may be accessed by persons living in Ontario and specifically, northern Ontario. This will expand upon previous findings and provide additional information critical to understanding a fuller picture of the type and amount of health services accessed by persons living in this geographical location. Within the Canadian context, an examination of this data at a provincial level is meaningful as healthcare funding and healthcare delivery are responsibilities of the respective provincial governments. Therefore, the most meaningful comparisons related to healthcare service and delivery can occur provincially within the same overall jurisdiction.

Purpose

This aim of this study is to describe associations of self-rated health and healthcare service use in an Ontario cohort of adults who self-identify as being diagnosed with COPD.

Research questions

This study aims to answer the following research questions.

  1. What is the difference between the self-reported health of those with COPD living in northern Ontario compared to those living elsewhere in the province?
  2. What healthcare services are used by persons living with COPD in Ontario and northern Ontario? Are the rate and types of services used related to self-reported health?

Data and Methods

Design and sample

This correlation comparative study extracted relevant data available through the Public Use Micro-data file of the 2017-2018 Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) (Statistics Canada, 2020). It is one of the largest population-based repository of health data gathered though national cross-sectional survey methods. The Public Use Micro-data file, which includes data collected over a two-year period, represents health status, healthcare utilization, and health determinants. As a credible health research data source, its availability for secondary analysis supports the examination of health surveillance at local, provincial, and national levels (Statistics Canada, 2020).

The CCHS survey uses multi-staged sampling method. The provinces are divided into clusters. Clusters are geographic regions of 100-600 dwellings. A sample of primary units, corresponding to geographic regions called clusters, are initially selected. In the second stage of sampling, dwelling lists are prepared for each selected cluster. Dwellings are then selected from these lists through systematic sampling. The total surveyed sample for 2017-2018 CCHS was 113, 289 Canadians, aged 12 and older, residing in one of 10 provinces and the three territories. The sample size of adult Ontarians was 33 510. Excluded from the survey's coverage are: persons living on reserves and other Aboriginal settlements in the provinces; full-time members of the Canadian Forces; the institutionalized population.

Data extraction

For this cohort, the following health-related and health service use variables were extracted.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Respondents were asked if they had a chronic condition. Those who responded "yes" to the question, "Do you have a chronic bronchitis, emphysema or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or COPD?" were considered to have self-reported COPD.

Health

Respondents were asked, “In general, would you say your health is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor?” Those who responded “excellent” or “very good” were grouped together and those who responded “fair or poor” were grouped together. The variable of poor health was created grouping those who responded excellent, very good, and good together and those who responded fair or poor together.

Mental health

Respondents were asked, “In general, would you say your mental health is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor?” Those who responded “excellent” or “very good” were grouped together and those who responded “fair or poor” were grouped together. The variable of poor mental health was created grouping those who responded excellent, very good, and good together and those who responded fair or poor together.

Satisfaction with life

Respondents were asked, “Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means ‘very dissatisfied’ and 10 means ‘very satisfied’, how do you feel about your life as a whole right now?” Those who responded “0, 1, 2, or 3” were grouped together, those who responded “4, 5, or 6” were grouped together, and those who responded “7, 8, 9, or 10” were grouped together.

Life stress

Respondents were asked, “Thinking about the amount of stress in your life, would you say that most of your days are not stressful at all, not very stressful, a bit stressful, quite a bit stressful, or extremely stressful?” Those who responded “quite a bit stressful” or “extremely stressful” were grouped together.

Level of coordination between regular HCP and other health professionals

Respondents were asked, “In general, how would you rate the level of coordination between your regular health care provider and other health professionals who provide you with regular care? Would you say the coordination is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor?” Those who responded “excellent” or “very good” were grouped together and those who responded “fair or poor” were grouped together. The variable of poor coordination was created grouping those who responded excellent, very good, and good together and those who responded fair or poor together.

Health service use

In the CCHS, persons were asked if, in addition to their primary healthcare provider, they saw any other healthcare providers. A series of possible provider types was provided. We consider both these individual provider types and the total number of services accessed as proxies for the capacity to access health services as needed.

Geographic location

In the CCHS, there are variables for each of the health units in Ontario. Six health units are included within the northern Ontario region. A variable was created that indicates those living in the health units that fall within the northern Ontario region. The geographic boundaries are the eastern border of Ontario to the Quebec border, the northern border of Ontario at James and Hudson Bay, the western border of Ontario to the Manitoba border and southern border of the North Bay and Parry Sound Health Unit (NBPSHU) catchment area. Comparisons are made between those living within the northern Ontario region and those living in the rest of the province. The southern border of the NBPSHU is irregular, but captures part of the Muskoka region down to 45.17 degrees north. Covariates and demographic variables Age, gender, marital status, income, and education level were used to describe the sample and were used as covariates in adjusted models.

Ethics

This study was approved by the Laurentian University Research Ethics Board (Certificate 6018367).

Statistical analysis

A file of extracted data specific to Ontarians was created. A descriptive analysis was conducted to describe the self-reported overall health and health service usage between community dwelling adult Ontarians with and without a diagnosis of COPD. Cohort differences were examined relative to gender, marital status, age, highest level of education, household income and geographic location. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the selected health and health service use variables. Differences between subjects with COPD and without COPD were tested with Chi-square tests. To determine factors associated with varying levels of health and age, logistic regression analyses were used. Poisson regression was used to determine the rate of health service use. In these analyses, adjustments were made for age, sex, marital status, income, and education level. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant,

All analyses were performed using Stata v16.1 statistical software (Stata Statistical Software, 2019). Population weights were applied according to Statistics Canada guidelines to ensure accurate measures of variance, and to eliminate the possibility of groups being over or under represented (Statistics Canada, 2020).

Results

Demographic characteristics
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of persons living in Ontario with and without COPD – provincially (N=33510) and regionally (N=4406)
  Provincially p-value Regionally p-value
  Self-reported COPD Does not report COPD   Self-reported COPD Does not report COPD  
Sex %     <0.01     0.13
Male41.745.7  41.846.4 
Female58.354.3  58.253.6  
Age%  <0.01   <0.01
Age 35-49 8.3 26.7  8.6 22.8 
Age 50-69 49.3 46.7  52.5 38.2 
Age 70 and older 42.4 26.7  38.9 26.7 
Marital status %  <0.01  <0.01
Married or common-law 43.0 51.5  42.7 50.8 
Widowed/divorced/separated 44.1 20.4  41.6 21.6 
Single 12.9 28.1  15.8 27.7 
Highest level of education %  <0.01  <0.01
Less than secondary school 30.2 19.4  36.7 23.3 
Secondary school graduate 26.4 23.3  23.0 24.0 
Post-secondary certificate, diploma or degree 43.4 57.4  40.3 52.8
Total household income %  <0.01  <0.01
Less than $39 999 44.5 23.2  45.0 26.3 
$40 000-$79 999 33.2 28.6  33.6 29.4 
Greater than $80 000 22.3 48.3  21.4 44.2 
Download Excel Table

More females (58%) report having COPD than males (42%) and about half are between age of 50 and 69 (49 to 52%) (Table 1). They report being with a partner (43%) or widowed/divorced (42 to 44%). Fewer report being single (12 to 16%). Northern Ontario has the highest percentage of those who report being single (16%). The majority of those with COPD report having a secondary school diploma or less than secondary school as their highest level of education. Northern Ontario has the highest percentage of those with a less than secondary school education (36.7%) compared to those living elsewhere in Ontario (30.2%). Among those with COPD, persons living in northern Ontario also has the lowest percentage of those with post-secondary education, 40% compared to 43 % provincially. Higher levels of education, specifically post-secondary education, were reported for those who did not report having COPD, provincially, 57%, and in northern Ontario, 53%. About 45% of persons with COPD have an income of less than $39 999 while nearly 55 % have an annual income greater than $40 000. Overall, fewer persons with COPD have an annual income of greater than $80 000, approximately 22 % of the sample population. Those without COPD, whether they lived in northern Ontario or elsewhere in the province, were much more likely to report incomes greater than $80 000, 44% and 48%, respectively.

Table 2. General health, mental health, life stress and sense of community belonging- provincially (N=33448) and regionally (N=4677)
  Provincially p-value Regionally p-value
  Self-reported COPD Does not report COPD   Self-reported COPD Does not report COPD  
Perceived Overall Health  <0.001  <0.001
Excellent/Very Good18.459.415.955.0
Good30.727.931.029.6
Fair/ Poor50.912.753.115.4
Perceived Mental Health  <0.001  <0.001
Excellent/Very good 51.368.443.766.4
Good29.723.734.225.4
Fair/Poor19.18.022.18.1
Satisfaction with Life in General (Scale 1-10)  <0.001  <0.001
0-38.01.88.82.1
4-626.910.828.811.3
7-1065.187.462.386.6
Perceived Life Stress  <0.001  <0.001
Not at all stressful14.914.616.415.8
Not very stressful22.026.224.826.4
A bit stressful35.939.629.238.4
Quite a bit/ extremely stressful27.219.529.6)19.4
Perceived Stress at Work  0.028 0.09
Not at all stressful13.010.513.010.9
Not very stressful17.220.820.420.9
A bit stressful37.741.825.940.8
Quite a bit/ extremely stressful32.126.940.727.4
Perceived Sense of Belonging to Local Community  <0.001  <0.001
Very strong18.620.721.422.3
Somewhat strong45.451.740.153.2
Somewhat weak21.820.321.017.6
Very weak14.27.321.46.9
Download Excel Table

There were notable differences among the ratings persons with COPD and those without COPD assigned to their perception of their overall health. Persons with COPD were far less likely to rate their overall health as excellent or very good compared to those without COPD, 18.4% and 59.4%, respectively (Table 2). About the same percentage (31-30%) rate their health as good, across both groups. Provincially, the percentage of those who rate their health as fair or poor was 50.9%, however, those who live in Northern Ontario with COPD were the most likely with rate their health as fair or poor, 53.1%.

Differences were also noted among the ratings persons assigned to their mental health. Persons with COPD were less likely to rate their mental health as excellent or very good compared to those without COPD, 51.3% compared to 68.4%. Those living in Northern Ontario with COPD were the least likely (43.7%) to rate their mental health as excellent or very good. Similar percentages were noted between those with COPD and those without COPD who rated their mental health as good, ranging from 23.7% to 34.2%. Across both groups with COPD, those living in Northern Ontario were most likely to rate their mental health as fair or poor, 22.1% compared to 19.1% provincially.

Those living with COPD were more likely to rate their overall satisfaction with life with a lower score (0-3) than those without COPD, about 8% compared to about 2%, of those persons who do not live with COPD. The percentage of persons who rank their satisfaction with life highly (score of 7-10) also varies between those living with COPD and those without COPD. About 65% of those living with COPD ranked their satisfaction high (65.1%, and 62.3%, respectively) compared to about 87% of those who do not live with COPD (87.4%, and 86.6%, respectively).

Persons living with COPD and those without COPD ranked their perceived life stress similarly if they ranked their life stress as not at all, not very or a bit stressful, across both groups, provincially, and regionally. Differences between those living with or without COPD were noted among those who ranked their life as quite a bit or extremely stressful. Those living with COPD were more likely to rank their life stress as quite a bit or extremely stressful, 27.2% compared to 19.5%, provincially. Those living in Northern Ontario with COPD were most likely to rank their life stress as quite a bit or extremely stressful, 29.6%, compared to 19.4% of those living in Northern Ontario without COPD.

Similar trends were noted among the rankings of perceived stress at work among those living with COPD compared to those not living with COPD. Persons living with COPD and those without COPD ranked their perceived work stress similarly if they ranked their work stress as not at all, not very or a bit stressful, across both groups, provincially, and regionally. Differences between those living with or without COPD were noted among those who ranked their work stress as quite a bit or extremely stressful. Those living with COPD were more likely to rank their work stress as quite a bit or extremely stressful, 32.1% compared to 26.9%, provincially. Those living in Northern Ontario with COPD were most likely to rank their work stress as quite a bit or extremely stressful, 40.7%, compared to 27.4% of those living in Northern Ontario without COPD.

Persons living with COPD and those without COPD ranked their perceived sense of belonging to community similarly if they ranked their perceived belonging as very strong, somewhat strong or somewhat weak, across both groups, provincially, and regionally. Differences between those living with or without COPD were noted among those who ranked their perceived belonging to community as very weak. Those living with COPD were more likely to rank their perceived belonging to community as very weak, 14.2% compared to 7.3%, provincially. Those living in Northern Ontario with COPD were most likely to rank their perceived belonging to community as very weak, 21.4%, compared to only 6.4% of those living in Northern Ontario without COPD.

Table 3. Patterns of primary health care receipt and reasons why one does not have a primary health care provider – provincially (N=33327) and regionally (N=4669)
  Provincially p-value Regionally p-value
  Self-reported COPD Does not report COPD   Self-reported COPD Does not report COPD  
Is there a place you usually go for immediate care of a minor problem <0.001 0.117
Yes93.891.293.991.2
No6.48.86.18.8
What kind of place? <0.001 0.935
Doctor’s Office62.660.942.645.4
Hospital outpatient1.51.31.82.0
Community health centre4.44.08.29.0
Walk in Clinic14.620.617.621.4
Hospital Emergency15.612.121.120.6
Some other place1.31.21.41.6
Do you have a regular Health Care Provider? <0.001 0.13
Yes94.590.994.587.8
No5.59.15.512.2
Reasons why you do not have a regular Health Care Provider
No need 0.549 0.433
Yes19.021.819.018.1
No81.078.281.081.9
No one available in the area 0.006 0.012
Yes27.416.148.025.3
No72.683.952.074.7
No one is taking new patients 0.496 0.932
Yes21.916.220.019.3
No78.183.880.080.7
Have not tried to find one <0.001 0.053
Yes8.326.04.019.5
No91.774.096.080.5
Health Care Provider left or retired 0.011 0.305
Yes38.125.840.030.3
No61.974.260.069.7)
Other  0.629  0.465
Yes23.821.620.014.7
No76.278.480.085.3
Download Excel Table

Provincially or regionally, approximately 90% of participants identified an accessible care service (Table 3). This was most commonly a doctor’s office followed by a walk-in clinic. The third most common service was a hospital emergency department. There were, however, significant differences in type of service identified between northern Ontario and the rest of Ontario. Northern Ontarians identify a hospital emergency room as the second most common place they seek care for a health issue. Approximately 1/5th of the northern partners, regardless if diagnosed with COPD (21.1%) or not (20.6%) access emergency services for a ‘minor issue.’ Provincially, only 15.6% of those living with COPD, and 12.1% living without COPD, identify a hospital emergency room as a source of care for a minor health issue. For those living in Northern Ontario, living with or without COPD, a community health centre was commonly identified as a place where persons sought care, 8.2 % and 9.0%, respectively. The highest percentages of community health centre use were reported in Northern Ontario, those living elsewhere in the province rarely identified a community health centre as a place to seek care for a minor health problem, 4.4% and 4.0% respectively. Hospital outpatient settings and other settings were the least common places persons sought care for a minor problem regardless of where persons resided.

Those living with COPD were more likely to report having a regular health care provider than their counterparts living without COPD. For those who do not have a regular health care provider, the most common reason identified was no one was available in the area. For those living in Northern Ontario with COPD, 48% of those without a health care provider identified this as the reason. The second most common reason identified was that their health care provider retired or left the area, and this was highest reason for those living in Northern Ontario with COPD with 40% citing this as the reason.

Table 4. Patterns of primary health care providers including timing, other health care providers and coordination among providers – provincially (N=29264) and regionally (N=4090)
  Provincially p-value Regionally p-value
  Self-reported COPD Does not report COPD   Self-reported COPD Does not report COPD  
Type of regular Health Care Provider <0.001 0.331
Family doctor/General Practitioner95.596.7 91.292.8
Medical Specialist0.60.6 0.40.5
Nurse Practitioner4.02.3 8.46.1
Other 0.00.4 0.00.5
   
Waiting time for care of a minor problem 0.202 0.894
Same day24.224.4 17.815.9
Next day15.717.8 11.79.8
2-3 days20.522.7 15.717.3
4-6 days9.69.3 10.010.6
1-2 weeks15.714.9 18.320.3
2 weeks to 1 month7.76.7 15.214.5
1 month or more4.34.0 11.311.5
Other Regular Health Care Provider 
Another Family Doctor/General Practitioner 0.087 0.551
Yes6.95.9 8.47.4
No93.194.1 91.692.6
Specialist <0.001 <0.001
Yes44.822.3 39.822.7
No55.277.7 60.277.3
Nurse/Nurse Practitioner <0.001 0.002
Yes12.47.1 16.510.3
No87.692.9 83.5389.8
Chiropractor <0.001 0.022
Yes7.610.9 7.212.0
No92.489.1 92.888.0
Registered Dietician <0.001 0.032
Yes5.92.1 6.03.4
No94.197.9 94.096.6
Pharmacist <0.001 <0.001
Yes24.911.8 25.314.0
No75.188.2 74.786.0
Physiotherapist 0.683 0.4
Yes6.97.2 7.66.3
No93.192.8 92.493.7
Psychologist/Mental Health Professional <0.001 0.046
Yes5.63.7 6.84.2
No94.492.3 93.295.8
Social Worker <0.001 0.014
Yes3.91.6 4.82.3
No96.198.4 95.297.7
Other  0.263 0.436
Yes6.27.0 4.86.0
No93.893.0 95.294.0
None (no other Health Care Provider) <0.001 <0.001
Yes32.451.3 32.947.6
No67.648.7 67.152.4
Level of Coordination between regular HCP and other Health Professionals <0.001 0.007
Excellent/Very Good62.254.4 56.853.1
Good22.521.5 18.522.1
Fair/Poor11.312.2 21.614.1
Not applicable3.911.9 3.110.6
Download Excel Table

Provincially about 95% of persons living with or without COPD identified their regular health care provider as a family physician (Table 4). In northern Ontario, about 91% identified their regular health care provider as a family physician. In northern Ontario about 8% of those with self-reported COPD identified their regular care provider as a nurse practitioner compared to only 4% of persons with COPD living elsewhere in the province. Persons were also asked to identify their wait time to see their primary health care provider for a minor problem. Provincially, about one-quarter of persons, with or without COPD were able to see their primary health care provider on the same day, whereas only about 17% of those living in northern Ontario were able to do so. The amount of time persons living in northern Ontario, with or without COPD, reported waiting for an appointment were higher than those living elsewhere in the province. In northern Ontario, about 18% reported waiting 1-2 weeks before being seen compared to about 15% waiting 1-2 weeks elsewhere in the province. About 15% reported waiting 2 weeks to 1 month for an appointment in northern Ontario compared to 6% elsewhere in the province. Lastly, 11% reported waiting 1 month or more in northern Ontario and only 4% reported waiting 1 month or more elsewhere in the province.

An ordinal logistic regression were used to determine if the self-reported wait times were different for those with COPD living in Ontario and in Northern Ontario. This was not statistically significant indicating that persons with COPD did not wait longer for care than those without COPD.

Persons were also asked to report if, in addition to their primary care provider, they saw other health care providers. Provincially, 6% of those living with COPD reported seeing other health care providers and 8% of those living with COPD in northern Ontario reported seeing other health care providers. A specialist was identified most commonly by those living with COPD, 44.8% provincially and 39.8% regionally. About one-quarter of persons living with COPD, provincially and regionally, identified seeing a pharmacist. Only about 6% (6.3% to 7.6%) of persons, with and without COPD, living in northern Ontario or elsewhere in the province, reported seeing a physiotherapist. About 6% of those living with COPD, provincially and in northern Ontario reported seeing a psychologist or mental health professional.

Overall, the majority of persons with COPD were satisfied with the level of coordination between their regular health care provider and other health professionals as most, 62% provincially, and 56.8% regionally, reported the level of coordination to be excellent or very good. Conversely, those living with COPD in northern Ontario were more likely to report their level of coordination between their regular health care provider and other health professionals as fair or poor, compared to only 11.3% of those living with COPD elsewhere in the province.

In the CCHS, persons were asked if, in addition to their primary healthcare provider, they saw any other healthcare providers. A series of possible provider types was provided. We consider both these individual provider types and the total number of services accessed as proxies for the capacity to access health services as needed. Because a substantial proportion of respondents did not access any additional services, the number of total services was modelled using a poisson regression for this analysis.

Provincially, overall, persons with COPD reported using additional health care services beyond primary healthcare (1.26) than those persons without COPD. Those reporting their health as good were more likely to use more services than those reporting their health as excellent or very good (1.31) and those reporting their health as fair or poor were also more likely to use more services (1.99). Use of health services did vary by age, such that respondents aged 35 to 49 tended to use more (1.21) times more likely to access services than younger respondents (less than 35 years), this increased for those 50-69 (1.42) and again for those 70 or older (1.65). Female respondents tended to use more services (1.31) than males. There was also an effect of income such that those with higher incomes, $80 000 or higher, reported using the greatest number of services, and those with incomes from $40 000 to $79 000 used more services (1.14) than those reporting lower incomes of less than $39 000.

Regionally, those living in northern Ontario, persons with COPD reported using additional health care services beyond primary healthcare (1.01 but not statistically significant) than those persons without COPD. Those reporting their health as good were more likely to use more services than those reporting their health as excellent or very good (1.30) and those reporting their health as fair or poor were also more likely to use more services (1.84). Use of health services did vary by age, such that respondents aged 35 to 49 tended to use more (1.31) times more likely to access services than younger respondents (less than 35 years), this increased for those 50-69 (1.24) and again for those 70 or older (1.53). Female respondents tended to use more services (1.34) than males. However, in this region there was no statistically significant effect of income.

Table 5. Patterns of unmet health care needs (self-perceived) including frequency and reasons why need was unmet (last 12 months) - provincially (N=33189) and regionally (N=4640)
  Provincially p-value Regionally p-value
  Self-reported COPD Does not report COPD   Self-reported COPD Does not report COPD  
Needed health care but did not receive it>0.001>0.001
Yes11.45.913.56.7
No88.694.186.693.3
Why didn’t you get care?
Care not available in area0.1270.052
Yes14.210.427.815.1
No85.889.672.284.9
Care not available at the time (Dr busy/ away from office/inconvenient time)0.2970.503
Yes23.720.325.020.2
No76.379.775.079.8
Did not have regular Health Care Provider0.5940.824
Yes8.37.711.19.9
No91.792.888.990.1
Waiting time too long0.0790.002
Yes24.330.711.137.0
No75.769.388.963.0
Appointment was cancelled0.8440.113
Yes1.82.08.33.1
No98.298.091.796.9)
Felt would receive inadequate care0.9540.963
Yes8.99.08.3%8.6
No91.191.091.791.4
Cost0.1670.150
Yes 6.59.80.05.5
No93.590.2100.094.5
Decided not to seek care0.5540.190
Yes7.18.42.89.3
No92.991.697.290.8
Doctor didn’t think it was necessary0.2180.189
Yes12.49.516.79.6
No87.690.583.390.4
Transportation issue0.6920.366
Yes4.74.18.34.8
No95.395.691.795.2
Other 0.9730.827
Yes23.223.216.718.2
No76.976.883.381.6
What type of care was needed?
Treatment of a chronic physical health condition>0.0010.122
Yes48.029.744.431.6
No52.070.355.668.4
Treatment of a chronic mental health condition0.4190.041
Yes9.411.319.48.7
No90.688.680.691.3
Treatment of acute infectious disease (cold/flu)0.9370.563
Yes8.89.05.68.3
No91.291.094.491.7
Treatment of an acute physical condition (non-infectious)0.1300.676
Yes12.316.819.416.7
No87.783.280.683.3
Treatment of acute mental health condition
(acute stress reaction)
0.1441.000
Yes3.56.35.65.6
No96.593.794.494.4
A regular check up0.0770.086
Yes2.35.50.07.6
No97.794.5100.092.4
Care of an injury0.6220.646
Yes10.011.211.113.9
No90.088.988.986.1
Dental care0.0150.477
Yes0.64.50.01.4
No99.495.5100.098.6
Medication/prescription refill0.1370.702
Yes8.85.95.67.3
No91.294.194.492.7
Other 0.2410.838
Yes20.516.916.718.1
No79.583.183.381.9
Did you actively try to obtain health care needed?0.899
Yes78.878.480.681.9
No21.221.619.418.2
Where did you try to get service you were seeking?
Doctor’s office0.996
Yes56.256.253.650.6
No43.943.846.449.4
Hospital outpatient clinic0.505
Yes8.56.97.15.9
No91.593.192.994.1
Community health centre0.752
Yes5.46.110.710.0
No94.693.989.390.0
A walk-in clinic0.769
Yes13.114.025.012.6
No87.086.075.087.5
ED or emergency room0.881
Yes21.521.017.928.0
No78.579.082.172.0
Other 0.940
Yes21.521.317.918.0
No78.578.782.182.0
Download Excel Table

Provincially or regionally, the majority of persons, 86% to 94%, living with COPD or not, reported that they were able to receive health care when needed (Table 5). However, some persons identified that they needed health care but did not receive it. Those living with COPD in Northern Ontario were most likely to report needing heath care but not receiving care (13.5%), compared to 11.4% of those living with COPD provincially. Those without COPD living in the north, were also more likely to report needed care and not receiving it (6.7%) compared to those without COPD living elsewhere in the province (5.9%).

In the north, the most common reason identified as why someone did not receive care was that care was not available in the area, as 27.8% of persons with COPD and 15.1% of persons without COPD cited this reason. Provincially, percentages were lower and did not vary greatly between those with or without COPD, as 14.2% and 10.4%, respectively reported this as the reason why they did not receive care. In the north, the next most common reason cited as why someone did not receive care was that care was not available at the time, 25% for those with COPD, and 20.2% for those without COPD. Reported percentages were similar provincially, 23.7% for those with COPD and 20.3% for those without COPD.

Provincially, the most common reason identified as why they did not receive care when needed was that the wait time was too long, 24.3% for those with COPD, and 30.7% for those without COPD. In the north, only 11.1% of those with COPD identified wait time as the reason, and 37% of those without COPD identified wait time as the reason.

Those living with COPD in the north were the only group who did not identify cost as a possible reason for not getting care. All other groups, those living with and without COPD provincially and those without COPD living in the north, a small percentage identified cost as a reason, 6.5%, 9.8%, and 5.5%, respectively. Those living with COPD in the north reported transportation issues, 8.3%, compared to about 4% for those with or without COPD elsewhere in the province or in the north without COPD.

Most persons sought care for treatment of a chronic physical health condition. For those living with COPD provincially and regionally, almost half sought care for this reason, 48.0% and 44.4%, respectively. About 30% of persons without COPD stated they sought care for this reason, both provincially and regionally. Treatment of an acute physical, non-infectious condition was the second most common reason persons sought care, 12% to 20% of persons identified this reason across all groups.

Across all groups, about 80% stated they actively tried to obtain the health care needed. A doctor’s office was the most common place identified as 50% or more persons identified this as the place they sought care. Twenty-five percent of those living in the north with COPD identified a walk-in clinic as the place they tried to receive care. Comparatively, only 13.1% of those living with COPD elsewhere in the province tried to access a walk-in clinic. An emergency department was another place persons sought to receive care. Those with COPD provincially identified this location, 21.5%, compared to 17.9% in northern Ontario, and those living without COPD provincially, 21% compared to 28% of those in northern Ontario. In the north, about 10% those living with or without COPD identified a community health centre as the place they tried to seek care from, comparatively only about 5% of persons living with or without COPD elsewhere in the province identified a community health centre.

After controlling for gender, education, martial status, and education level, there was an association between their self reports of their level of health and having COPD and living in Northern Ontario [t=-35.15, p>0.001, CI:-0.70- -0.63] such that residents of Northern Ontario living with COPD were more likely rate their health lower than those without COPD. There was an association between their self reports of their level of mental health and having COPD and living in Northern Ontario [t=-11.93, p>0.001, CI:-0.26- -0.19] such that residents of Northern Ontario living with COPD were more likely rate their mental health lower than those without COPD. In addition, there was an association between rankings of general satisfaction with life and having COPD and living in Northern Ontario [t=14.32, p>0.001, CI:0.19- 0.25] such that residents of Northern Ontario living with COPD were more likely to rank their general satisfaction with life higher than those living elsewhere

After controlling for gender, education, martial status, and education level, there was an association between their self reports of their life stress and having COPD and living in Northern Ontario [t=-5.47, p>0.001, CI:-0.18- -0.08] such that residents of Northern Ontario living with COPD were more likely rate their life stress higher than those without COPD. There was an association between self reports of stress at work and having COPD and living in Northern Ontario [t=-3.06, p>0.001, CI:-0.22- -0.05] such that residents of Northern Ontario living with COPD were more likely to rate their stress at work higher than those without COPD.

Discussion

The study researchers undertook a secondary analysis of provincial data within a national survey of self-reported health data, the CCHS, which examined the self-reported health status of Ontarians, the self-reported type of health services accessed, and self-reported challenges or barriers to accessing health services. As it is known that those living with COPD require health care services to manage their condition, this common, chronic illness of COPD was used to compare persons living with this condition to others not living with this condition, and to determine if there were any notable differences between the two populations of persons living in the northern regions of the province.

Overall, people in Ontario, Canada, who report having COPD are more likely to report poorer overall health compared to those without COPD. Additionally, those living in the northern regions of the province reported even lower health scores than those living elsewhere in the province. Those with COPD were more likely to report poor mental health compared to those without COPD and self reported mental health was even lower for those living with COPD in northern Ontario. Similar findings were found for self-reported mental health for those living in northern Ontario. Those with COPD were also more likely to report their life satisfaction as lower than those living without COPD, however, the reported percentages of those who rated their life satisfaction lower were similar for those living in northern Ontario as they were for those living elsewhere in the province. Overall, living with COPD regardless of where you live, decreases ones health and life satisfaction.

These findings relate to the nature of the chronic illness of COPD, as this condition is known to lessen quality of life especially when symptoms interfere with daily functioning, social relationships and work responsibilities (Cully et al., 2006; Public Health Agency of Canada, 2018; Verma et al., 2018; Williams et al., 2007) Daily activities such as getting out of bed, caring for self, eating, working, and having a conversation become increasingly difficult as individuals are unable to catch their breath. As a result of these debilitating symptoms, one may expect that those living with this condition would report poorer health than those not living with COPD. Findings of this study support what is known about living with this condition.

Further, these findings extend previous findings that have demonstrated that health is lower or poorer for those who live in northern regions (Young et al., 2019). These findings add to what is known regarding both self-reported health and COPD (Duff Cloutier et al., 2023), and health care disparities of those living in northern regions. Self-reported health is lower for persons living with COPD and this may be compounded and be reported even lower if one lives with COPD and lives in the north. Further, individuals living with COPD of lower socioeconomic status, from rural areas, and from marginalized communities often have decreased access to health care services (Pleasants et al., 2016). Pleasant’s et al. (2116) found that there is a greater burden of COPD in persons of lower socioeconomic status attributed to individual health behaviours and social, political and structural exposures. Not only is there increased risk of developing COPD, but there are worse COPD health outcomes for those persons. In this study, there are similar demographic profiles of individuals living with COPD in northern Ontario, as they have lower levels of education and lower income levels than those living elsewhere in the province. The lower ratings of self-reported health and the demographic characteristics reported of those living with COPD in the north may compound or influence health care access for this population.

This study also examined self-reported health care access. Individual’s access to a family doctor is often used as a measure of access to primary care. In this study, most persons report having access to a family doctor, regardless of whether they report having COPD. Interestingly, the highest numbers of persons reporting that their primary care provider was a nurse practitioner were highest in northern Ontario compared to elsewhere in the province. So many had access to primary care but with a different type of health care provider, perhaps indicative of the different types of service available in northern communities.

Overall, the majority of persons report seeking care for a minor health care problem at their family doctor’s office. Interestingly, for those living in northern Ontario, the second most common location identified for care for a minor problem was an emergency department, the reported percentage of persons who identified this location as a place to seek care was higher in this region compared to the those living elsewhere in the province.

In northern Ontario, community health centres were also commonly identified as a location for seeking care, as a greater number of persons living in northern Ontario reported this location more commonly than those living elsewhere in the province. These two locations, emergency room departments and community health centres, identified more commonly by those living in the north, highlight the types of health care services available to those living in the north and perhaps the accessibility of available health care services. Family doctor’s offices may not be available or open to walk in appointments at the time when care is required. Emergency departments are more likely to be accessible or open 24 hours a day, and community health centres, as they are typically multidisciplinary by nature, are likely staffed by more than just a family doctor. As such, these locations may be more likely to accommodate treatment for a minor problem and may offer more flexibility and more open access.

Although findings indicate that most persons have access to primary care, the wait times to be seen were highest in northern Ontario. Therefore, yes, persons do have access but the frequency that visits occur due to wait times requires further investigation examination regarding the impact on overall access to care.

Seeking health care in an emergency department is more commonly viewed as access to acute care services and is commonly viewed as an expensive type of health care service. It is also frequently viewed as a negative or less desirable form of health care service to generally manage COPD. COPD is often referred to as an ambulatory sensitive condition in other health care literature, meaning it is ideally managed in primary care and accessing acute care services, for example to manage exacerbations, are typically viewed as a marker of poor control or management over the condition. However, in the case of the provision of healthcare services in Northern Ontario, this may not be the case. Our study has indicated that more persons with COPD access emergency departments to receive care for a minor problem. While this may be an indicator or poor disease management, it may also be an accurate portrayal of the type of health care available in the North when care is required. This finding may extend previous work has suggested that patterns of emergency department visits may be an indicator of access to primary care and outpatient services and in some areas with less available primary care services, care that is required may be absorbed through emergency department visits (Clark et al., 2021; Mian & Pong, 2012; Roberge et al., 2007). Other researchers have also identified that physicians working in rural settings often work in primary care settings plus carry on call schedules and hospital responsibilities (Incitti et al., 2003; Wenghofer et al., 2014). Hence, visits that are occurring in emergency departments may actually be an extension of primary care and occurring in different locations as those are the locations where care providers are located at the time when care is needed.

Additionally, as those living with COPD experience exacerbations, periods of breathlessness and other troubling symptoms, they may seek care in an emergency department as a way to receive immediate help. While healthcare providers may sometimes view these visits as unnecessary, not the most appropriate location to receive help, and as a sign of poor self-management, persons living with this condition report a different perspective. Persons may report accessing these types of services as one option that is available and often report that there was a pressing need for this type of healthcare service and they required this type of care at the time (Langer et al., 2013). The perspective of the person accessing care is important to consider as it is in contrast to the position that the majority of research has stated. The high use and high cost of acute care services is well documented (A. Gershon et al., 2013; A. S. Gershon et al., 2017). Langer and colleagues (2013) also report that for socially or economically marginalized persons, unscheduled care like emergency room visits, offers access to clinical and social care that may be otherwise unavailable. This finding is of particular relevance to those living in the northern areas of the province as many persons may be marginalized as education and income levels are lower than in other areas of the province. Subsequently accessing these types of services may meet these additional needs for those living in the north. Further exploration of the person’s view of seeking care in an emergency room, or other types of unscheduled care is warranted.

Access to primary care is often referred to as a measure of health care service availability. Our study demonstrates that most persons have access to health care as most persons reported they have access to primary care since the majority report having a primary care provider. In addition to this common measure of service availability, persons were also asked if they needed health care and were unable to receive it. Reasons why one didn’t receive care when care was required were also collected. In northern Ontario, the most common reason identified for not receiving care when it was required was that care was not available in the area, and the second most common reason was that care was not available at the time. Yet again, this study finding further highlights the disparities and decreased availability of health care resources in this northern region of Ontario. The most common reason identified why care was needed, but not received, was that care was needed to manage a chronic condition, like COPD. Service availability is of particular importance to those living with COPD as COPD is both a progressive degenerative condition that also has episodic exacerbations. Health care service availability may be required to manage these both these episodic exacerbations and worsening symptoms over time.

In addition to access to primary care services, this study also examined access to other health care services, beyond primary care. Provincially, participants with self-reported COPD were also more likely to access health care services beyond primary care. Those whose health was reported as good/fair, or poor, were more likely to access other services. Females were more likely to access additional services than males. There was also an age effect, and an income effect, as older participants and those with higher incomes, were more likely to access additional services. As those experiencing poor self-rated health were also more likely to access services, they may have been seeking additional services to mitigate additional COPD symptoms. One possible explanation for those with higher incomes accessing more services may be that they have more disposable income as many of the additional health care services are not covered by the provincial government and participants may have to pay out of pocket or have additional private insurance to cover related health service costs. In northern Ontario, the model used to examine the amount of health service used was not statistically significant.

Another factor to consider is the expected heterogeneity of different areas of Ontario and northern Ontario with respect to the availability of healthcare services. The geographic area that encompasses the northern region of Ontario is very large, covering the majority of the land mass (80%) of the province and the communities and larger urban centres in the north may be many kilometers apart. The availability of healthcare services likely differs in different regions as some areas will have many different healthcare providers available to provide service. Other areas may have a smaller number of available service providers and they have different ones from the next community and so on. The total number of available healthcare service providers for an area or region is not part of this data set. Additionally, some persons may access health care services from areas outside of their home community, and may travel to other more serviced areas of the province to access healthcare service. As such, persons may report accessing healthcare service or report receiving healthcare service from a provider that was not located in their home community.

Overall, the nature of living with a chronic illness such as COPD, in a northern, perhaps marginalized setting with varying availability of healthcare service, is complex. Persons make decisions about how and when they chose to interact with the healthcare system in order to meet their self-identified health care needs. The choices they make do not necessarily align fully with the expectations of healthcare providers, such as the high use of acute care services instead of primary care services to manage a chronic condition. However, healthcare providers need to understand and appreciate the circumstances occurring at the times persons are making health care access decisions in order to fully appreciate and understand why they sought care in a particular location. It is simply to simplistic to say persons living with COPD use too many acute care services without fully understanding the surrounding conditions that influence the choices persons made at a given time. As such, there is tension among the healthcare providers and users of health care around healthcare services. Health care policies need to reflect the complex interplay among optimal management, the availability and the appropriateness of healthcare services, and the needs of the individuals living with COPD within this geographic region.

Conclusion

As there are known disparities for those living in the northern regions of Canada and Ontario, this study examined the differences in self-reported health, access to primary health care and access to additional health services among those living in the northern regions of Ontario and the rest of Ontario. This was accomplished by describing the self-reported health and service use of those living with COPD, a prevalent, chronic condition which requires interactions with the health care system for its management. This is especially important due to the large number of affected individuals and because the gap in healthcare service is so large. As such, healthcare policy should address this gap in service and strategically provide supportive services where the need is high, but access is low. Addressing the deficits in service will optimistically result in improved outcomes for those living with this condition. While this analysis has provided some additional insight into health and health service use relative to geography, further research is required to fully understand the complexity of health service use in this region.

This study has both strengths and limitations. One strength is the data are from a nationally representative, population-based survey and as the most meaningful comparisons regarding health and health status are made at a provincial level, it was possible to isolate and examine provincial data. The large provincial sample size is also a strength of the study. However, some populations are excluded from the CCHS data set, in particular, for example, those living on First Nations reserves and members of the Canadian Armed Forces. In addition, the CCHS is comprised of self-reported data and, as such, may be subject to recall bias or misclassification of data.

The 2017-2018 reporting interval was chosen because the next tranche available overlaps with the COVID period. This may have generated some specific issues in health perception and need for service for people with COPD.

Additionally, it is well known that the number of persons living with COPD is very likely to be underestimated (Baldomero, 2022; Hill et al., 2010; Labonté et al., 2016; Mannino & Holguin, 2006) as most persons are not diagnosed until their disease has progressed to later stages and have lived with the condition for many years prior to diagnosis, so a portion of those who self reported that they do not have COPD, may in fact have COPD. As such, analyses that attempted to determine differences between the two populations may not show differences as the two populations are indeed mixed.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors report that there is no conflict of interest. The results and views expressed are those of the authors and are not those of Statistics Canada.

REFERENCES

1.

Baldomero, A. K. (2022). Beyond access: Factors associated with spirometry underutilization Among patients with a diagnosis of COPD in urban tertiary care center. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases. Journal of the COPD Foundation, 9(4), 538-548.

2.

Burnett, K., Sanders, C., Halperin, D., & Halperin, S. (2020). Indigenous Peoples, settler colonialism, and access to health care in rural and northern Ontario. Health & Place, 66, 102445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102445

3.

Clark, K., John, P., Menec, V., Cloutier, D., Newall, N., O’Connell, M., & Tate, R. (2021). Healthcare utilisation among Canadian adults in rural and urban areas ? The Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.Clark, K., John, P., Menec, V., Cloutier, D., Newall, N., O’Connell, M., & Tate, R. (2021). Healthcare utilisation among Canadian adults in rural and urban areas ? The Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. 26(2), 69. https://doi.org/10.4103/CJRM.CJRM_43_20

4.

Crighton, E. J., Ragetlie, R., Luo, J., To, T., & Gershon, A. (2015). A spatial analysis of COPD prevalence, incidence, mortality and health service use in Ontario. Health Reports, 26(3), 10?18.

5.

Cully, J. A., Graham, D. P., Stanley, M. A., Ferguson, C. J., Sharafkhaneh, A., Souchek, J., & Kunik, M. E. (2006). Quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and comorbid anxiety or depression. Psychosomatics, 47(4), 312?319. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psy.47.4.312

6.

Duff Cloutier, J., Montgomery, P., Virchez, J., & Oddson, B. E. (2023). Self-Reported Health and Health Service Use Among Canadian Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Asia-Pacific Journal of Canadian Studies, 29(1), 5?28. https://doi.org/10.22691/kacs290101

7.

Gershon, A., Guan, J., Victor, J. C., Goldstein, R., & To, T. (2013). Quantifying health services use for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, 187(6), 596-601 6p. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201211-2044OC

8.

Gershon, A. S., Mecredy, G., Croxford, R., To, T., Stanbrook, M. B., & Aaron, S. D. (2017). Outcomes of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosed with or without pulmonary function testing. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 189(14), E530?E538. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.151420

9.

Health Quality Ontario. (2017). Health in the North: A report on geography and the health of people in Ontario’s two northern regions. Queen’s Printer for Ontario.

10.

Hill, K., Goldstein, R. S., Guyatt, G. H., Blouin, M., Tan, W. C., Davis, L. L., Heels-Ansdell, D. M., Erak, M., Bragaglia, P. J., Tamari, I. E., Hodder, R., & Stanbrook, M. B. (2010). Prevalence and underdiagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among patients at risk in primary care. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal = Journal de l’Association Medicale Canadienne, 182(7), 673?678. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.091784

11.

Incitti, F., Rourke, J., Rourke, L. L., & Kennard, M. (2003). Rural women family physicians. Are they unique? Canadian Family Physician, 49(3), 320?327.

12.

Labonte, L. E., Tan, W. C., Li, P. Z., Mancino, P., Aaron, S. D., Benedetti, A., Chapman, K. R., Cowie, R., FitzGerald, J. M., Hernandez, P., Maltais, F., Marciniuk, D. D., O’Donnell, D., Sin, D., & Bourbeau, J. (2016). Undiagnosed Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Contributes to the Burden of Health Care Use. Data from the CanCOLD Study. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 194(3), 285?298. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201509-1795OC

13.

Langer, S., Chew-Graham, C., Hunter, C., Guthrie, E. A., & Salmon, P. (2013). Why do patients with long-term conditions use unscheduled care? A qualitative literature review. Health & Social Care in the Community, 21(4), 339?351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01093.x

14.

Mannino, D. M., & Holguin, F. (2006). Epidemiology and global impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respiratory Medicine: COPD Update, 1(4), 114?120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmedu.2006.02.001

15.

McGibbon, E. (2016). Oppression and access to health care: Deepening the conversation. In D. Raphael (Ed.), Social determinants of health (3rd ed., pp. 491?520). Canadian Scholar’s Press.

16.

Mian, O., & Pong, R. (2012). Does better access to FPs decrease the likelihood of emergency department use?: Results from the Primary Care Access Survey. Canadian Family Physician, 58(11), e658?e666.

17.

North East Local Health Integration Network. (2017). 2017/2018 Annual Report.

18.

Pleasants, R. A., Riley, I. L., & Mannino, D. M. (2016). Defining and targeting health disparities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 11, 2475?2496. https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S 79077

19.

Public Health Agency of Canada. (2018). Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Canada, 2018. Report from the Canadian Chronic Disease Surveillance System.

20.

Roberge, D., Larouche, D., & Pineault, R. (2007). Hospital Emergency Departments: Substitutes for Primary Care? http://www.santepub-mtl.qc.ca/ESPSS/production.html

21.

Sibley, L. M., & Weiner, J. P. (2011). An evaluation of access to health care services along the rural-urban continuum in Canada. BMC Health Services Research, 11(1), 20.

22.

Stata Statistical Software (Version 16). (2019). [Computer software]. StataCorp.

23.

Statistics Canada. (2020). Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) 2017-2018 [Dataset]. https://abacus.library.ubc.ca/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:11272.1/AB2/SEB16A

24.

Verma, J. Y., Amar, C., Sibbald, S., & Rocker, G. M. (2018). Improving care for advanced COPD through practice change: Experiences of participation in a Canadian spread collaborative. Chronic Respiratory Disease, 15(1), 5?18. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1479972317712720

25.

Wenghofer, E. F., Timony, P. E., & Gauthier, N. J. (2014). “Rural” doesn’t mean “uniform”: Northern vs southern rural family physicians’ workload and practice structures in Ontario. Rural and Remote Health, 14(2), 2720.

26.

Williams, V., Bruton, A., Ellis-Hill, C., & McPherson, K. (2007). What really matters to patients living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? An exploratory study. Chronic Respiratory Disease, 4(2), 77?85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1479972307078482

27.

Young, T. K., Chatwood, S., & Marchildon, G. P. (2016). Healthcare in Canada’s North: Are We Getting Value for Money? Healthcare Policy, 12(1), 59?70.

28.

Young, T. K., Chatwood, S., Ng, C., Young, R. W., & Marchildon, G. P. (2019). The north is not all the same: Comparing health system performance in 18 northern regions of Canada. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 78(1), 1697474. https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2019.1697474

29.

Young, T. K., Ng, C., & Chatwood, S. (2015). Assessing health care in Canada’s North: What can we learn from national and regional surveys? International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 74, 10.3402/ijch.v74.28436. https://doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v74.28436
Copyright © The Korean Association for Canadian Studies. 2024.